🔗 Share this article

When the Russian President visited the South Asian nation four years ago, the global landscape was markedly different. That short trip, limited by the pandemic, focused on discussions on economic and military ties between the two leaders.

Months later, the large-scale military offensive of its neighbor would transform the Russian leader into a figure of international condemnation, greatly limiting his diplomatic travel.

Additionally, that era preceded a major change in ties between Washington and Delhi, marked by inflammatory rhetoric and the imposition of heavy trade tariffs.

"In this context, the importance of Putin's journey to meet Modi is profound, serving as a signal of resilient relations and a rejection of outside coercion," experts emphasize.

A Critical Juncture for Two Major Powers

The high-level meeting takes place at a crucial time. President Putin arrives after dismissing latest diplomatic initiatives for Ukraine, bolstered by reported gains by Russian forces.

"For Russia, the primary importance of this visit is its very occurrence," commented a senior researcher based in Moscow. "It indicates a movement toward something resembling routine global diplomacy."

From Delhi's standpoint, the stakes are even higher. The country navigates a difficult international environment, characterized by a less engaged United States, a diminished Russia, and an assertive China.

The tightrope walk was underscored just before the visit, when European ambassadors released a public commentary questioning Russia's peace efforts. This prompted a sharp response from Indian officials, who labeled it an inappropriate diplomatic practice.

'China Remains the Greatest Threat'

The India-Russia bond dates back to the Soviet period and is deeply entrenched, with Moscow historically being Delhi's primary arms provider. This relationship was generally accepted by the West before a change in approach.

For years, Western nations ignored India's large-scale buying of discounted Russian oil. However, in the wake of stalled diplomacy, accusations increased, leading to economic penalties and a major chill in transatlantic relations with Delhi.

"In response, India has reverted to its traditional posture of 'hedging'," noted a foreign policy expert. "It signals to the US that it has alternatives and is observing how the global dynamics settle."

Beyond international politics, India's core motivation with Russia is its strategic location. "China continues to be the greatest threat to India, and historically, India has depended on Russia as a continental balancer against China," the analyst stated.

The deepening Moscow-Beijing axis has raised alarms in Delhi, prompting efforts to prevent an unbreakable bond between its northern neighbor and its traditional ally.

This apprehension has also accelerated India's drive to diversify its defense procurement, shrinking its reliance on Russian equipment from about 70% to a reduced portion in recent years.

"India will attempt to find a middle ground: buy sufficient Russian arms to keep the partnership alive, but not become so dependent that a supply disruption would leave it vulnerable," the analyst concluded.

Energy and Economic Ties

Increased trade relations is likely to be a key agenda item. The Russian leader has publicly emphasized plans to take cooperation with India to a "qualitatively new level", in spite of Western sanctions.

The issue of crude oil purchases is central. Although the Indian government has stated to continue buying Russian oil, recent restrictions have slowed activity from the commercial buyers. Simultaneously, India has agreed to increase imports of American oil and gas.

A Russian official acknowledged "obstacles" in economic cooperation but insisted it would continue uninterrupted. The official downplayed the effect of sanctions, stating they would cause only "insignificant" and "temporary" disruptions and that Russia possesses the "technology" to bypass such measures.

Limited Leverage on Ukraine

When the two leaders sit down, the issue of Ukraine is expected to be mentioned primarily through India's consistent appeal for a peaceful resolution.

"Yes, Prime Minister Modi has access to all parties, India lacks the diplomatic clout to alter the course of the conflict," the analyst said. "Beyond urging negotiations, its capacity to effect change is limited."

Ultimately, notwithstanding the public displays of camaraderie between the two leaders, the partnership is at its core one of "pure realpolitik," driven by cold calculation in a volatile world.