🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. FSA. HRA. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? It's understandable. Who understands this complex system? Not the typical business owner. Nor the typical worker. Selecting the right medical coverage for companies – or for our families – appears to require it requires a PhD in medical insurance.

Our Healthcare System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Expensive

Based on recent research, typical households spends $twenty-seven thousand each year on medical coverage (increasing by 6% compared to last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to exceed $17,000 for each worker in 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Now federal operations is shut down because partisan disputes regarding tax credits which analysts predict will lead to a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Will We Seriously Consider National Health Insurance?

When will we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm proposing for our current Medicare system – an established insurance framework – merely extend to include all citizens. The existing system doesn't change. The way our healthcare providers get paid would change. Believe me, they'll adapt.

The Way National Health Insurance Could Function

A national health insurance program would require payments from workers and companies. In comparable systems, an employee making average wages must contribute approximately five point three percent to their healthcare. The company must contribute approximately 13.75%.

Does this appear like a lot? Unless you contrast that with what average US resident spends. I can name dozens of businesses that are routinely paying between 8% to 15% of their employee wages for medical benefits. And keep in mind that in comprehensive systems, these contributions also cover pension plans, sick pay, maternity leave and job loss protection in addition to supporting medical services. When including these expenses compared with what we pay for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Implementation for America

For America, universal healthcare funding would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a system already established. It ought to be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would pay more than lower-income earners. This includes both worker and company payments. And, like much of federal military, IT, social programs and infrastructure, the system should be outsourced by private contractors rather than a government office.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program represents a huge benefit for entrepreneurs like mine. It would place us on a level playing field against big corporations who can afford superior coverage. It would render management much easier (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to social security and Medicare taxes, instead of individual transactions to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would enable it easier to plan expenses annual expenditures, rather than enduring the complicated (and fruitless) process of negotiating with major insurers that we must do each year. Due to simplification, there would exist improved comprehension of coverage among workers – contrasted with the current system where they have to interpret the complications of existing plans. And there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for employers as we no longer have access to our employees' medical records for risk assessment and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as possible. But I've learned that public institutions play important functions in society, including national security to supporting essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage to all via universal healthcare enhances economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for small businesses that employ the majority of the country's workers and generate half the economic output. It makes it possible for workers to be healthier, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Are there a million considerations I haven't covered? Of course there are. Given rising medical expenses we've seen recently, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act is not working effectively. I understand that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where big changes are easier to implement. However extending universal Medicare, despite the additional taxes required, would still be a superior and more affordable strategy for not only controlling healthcare costs but providing access for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, must tone down national pride. America's medical care isn't exceptional. The US places significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality globally, according to major studies. Maybe one positive aspect amid present circumstances is that we undertake serious examination in the mirror and agree that big changes need to happen.