🔗 Share this article

Mainstream parties in power are increasingly enabling the far right to dictate the political agenda, according to a recent study carried out in Germany.

Academics found that this phenomenon has unwittingly benefited radical groups by validating their ideas and disseminating them more widely.

Analysis Based on Over 20 Years of Media Reporting

The results, released in the academic journal on political studies, relied on an automated text analysis of over 520,000 news pieces from six national publications.

Capital-based scholars observed that as the radical faction moved from fringe issues in the 1990s era to central themes like integration and immigration, established parties increasingly adapted their messaging in reaction.

This adjustment amplified the spread of these concepts and signaled to the electorate that such stances were legitimate.

Consequences for Democracy

"Public discourse by mainstream parties plays a central role in the voting performance of the far right," stated a political sociologist involved in the research.

"This factor has been overlooked," she added.

The impact was noticeable even when mainstream groups were criticising the radical faction. "They still receive focus," the researcher remarked. "The main point is that because we live in such a struggle for visibility, this attention is crucial."

Normalisation Phenomenon Throughout the Continent

While the research was centered around the German context, this normalisation effect is probable to affect countries throughout the European continent.

"You see this a lot in German and British news outlets," explained another co-author. "Radical groups makes a statement and everybody starts talking about it for several days."

"Although you're countering it, you're echoing it," he stated.

Hardening of Public Discourse

At certain points, political figures have also toughened their language to match that of the radical right.

In a recently published interview, a then German chancellor called for large-scale expulsions and urged them to happen "more frequently and rapidly."

Comparable examples can be found throughout the continent, as elected officials from nations ranging from the United Kingdom to the French Republic adopt the rhetoric of the far right, especially on migration.

This has formed an feedback loop that was unthinkable a decade ago.

Core Issue: Who Sets the Narrative?

"{If you're a moderate political group and you are discussing societal topics – migration, integration – in a way that is dictated by the rhythm of the far right, that's the essence of narrative control," clarified a study author.

Other parties have gone one step further, seeking to copy the strict platform of the radical right, even as studies indicates that doing so leads the electorate to vote for the far right.

Gradual Impact and Voter Awareness

The extent of data gathered showed that the impact of radical groups had been progressive and had grown with the passage of time.

"Public perception doesn't change from day to day," commented a co-author. "But if you hear this pessimistic narrative around migration frequently, and it is being spread not only by far-right parties but also, for example, by mainstream parties, then of course this narrative travels further."

Need for Established Groups to Develop Their Own Narratives

The study emphasized the necessity for mainstream political parties to carve out their own discourses, especially on subjects such as immigration and integration, instead of constantly following the far right.

"It's like a dance," said one researcher. "When the leader is far-right and you're responding to them, you cannot decide which music should be playing."